[Stone Ruins] Lithophotographie test Unknown

“These tests mark the Earliest known experiments in photolithography – an important original photomechanical process, whose developments paved the way to the dissemination of photography in print.” [1]

As early as 1848 Lemercier began experimenting with technology that could possibly unite photography and lithography. Consulting with the optician Noël Paymal Lerebours and chemists Charles-Louis Barreswil and Louis-Alphonse Davanne, Lemercier was the first to attempt to transform the fugitive paper-based photograph into a permanent ink-based photolithographic print. He named his process Lithophotographie.

By mid-1852 the team had succeeded in executing experimental trial proofs which he labled Essais de Lithophotographie; Impression Obtenue directement sur Pierre par la Photographie and, on June 28, delivered them along with an explanation of the process to the Académie des Sciences seeking a patent. On August 16, François Arago presented the work and the patent was granted.

Two years later, Lemercier went further and published a set of six halftone prints under the title Lithophotographie: Ou Impressions Obtenues Sur Pierre À L’aide De La Photographie. A full set of these prints was given to the Paris Academy of Sciences (9 January, 1854) as further proof that practical photo-lithography had been achieved. However, the success of their method was limited. Lemercier soon abandoned it because only a few copies could be reliably made and after 1860 he adopted Alphonse Poitevin’s process in preference to the method he and his associates had patented. [2]

Reproduced / Exhibited

Getty Object Number: 84.XP.779.7 (after the letter)

An Exhibition on Photographic Reproduction Processes from The Collection of Samuel J. Wagstaff, Jr. at the Grolier Club. 1983

References

[1] La Photographie II Collection Marie-Thérese et André Jammes Paris 21 March 2002 p. 54

[2] Jeff Rosen (1987) The Printed Photograph and the Logic of Progress in Nineteenth-Century France, Art Journal, 46:4, 305-311, DOI: 10.1080/00043249.1987.10792378